|
2006-2010年考研翻譯題及參考答案 | |||
作者:佚名 文章來(lái)源:轉(zhuǎn)載 點(diǎn)擊數(shù): 更新時(shí)間:2012/11/1 |
|
||
說(shuō)明:引用此文請(qǐng)注明出處,并務(wù)請(qǐng)保留后面的有效鏈接地址,謝謝!
2006年考研翻譯題及參考答案 Part C Directions: Read the following text carefully and then translate the underlined segments into Chinese. Your translation should be written clearly on ANSWER SHEET 2. (10 points) Is it true that the American intellectual is rejected and considered of no account in his society? I am going to suggest that it is not true. Father Bruckberger told part of the story when he observed that it is the intellectuals who have rejected First, the object of our study pleads for definition. What is an intellectual? 46) I shall define him as an individual who has elected as his primary duty and pleasure in life the activity of thinking in a Socratic (蘇格拉底) way about moral problems. He explores such problems consciously, articulately, and frankly, first by asking factual questions, then by asking moral questions, finally by suggesting action which seems appropriate in the light of the factual and moral information which he has obtained. 47) His function is analogous to that of a judge, who must accept the obligation of revealing in as obvious a manner as possible the course of reasoning which led him to his decision. This definition excludes many individuals usually referred to as intellectuals -- the average scientist, for one. 48) I have excluded him because, while his accomplishments may contribute to the solution of moral problems, he has not been charged with the task of approaching any but the factual aspects of those problems. Like other human beings, he encounters moral issues even in the everyday performance of his routine duties -- he is not supposed to cook his experiments, manufacture evidence, or doctor his reports. 49) But his primary task is not to think about the moral code which governs his activity, any more than a businessman is expected to dedicate his energies to an exploration of rules of conduct in business. During most of his waking life he will take his code for granted, as the businessman takes his ethics. The definition also excludes the majority of teachers, despite the fact that teaching has traditionally been the method whereby many intellectuals earn their living. 50) They may teach very well and more than earn their salaries, but most of them make little or no independent reflections on human problems which involve moral judgment. This description even fits the majority of eminent scholars. Being learned in some branch of human knowledge is one thing, living in "public and illustrious thoughts,” as Emerson would say, is something else.(www.nmet168.com) 46. 我將他定義為一個(gè)對(duì)道德問(wèn)題進(jìn)行蘇格拉底式思考并將此作為自己人生首要責(zé)任和快樂(lè)的人。 47. 他的職責(zé)與法官相似,必須承擔(dān)這樣的責(zé)任:用盡可能明了的方式來(lái)展示自己做出決定的推理過(guò)程。 48. 我之所以把他(普通科學(xué)家)排除在外,是因?yàn)楸M管他的成果可能會(huì)有助于解決道德問(wèn)題,但他承擔(dān)的任務(wù)只不過(guò)是研究這些問(wèn)題的事實(shí)方面。 49. 但是,他的首要任務(wù)并不是考慮支配自己行為的道德規(guī)范,就如同不能指望商人專注于探索行業(yè)規(guī)范一樣。 50. 他們可以教得很好,而且不僅僅是為了掙薪水,但他們大多數(shù)人卻很少或沒(méi)有對(duì)需要進(jìn)行道德判斷的、人的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行獨(dú)立思考。 引用地址: |
|||
|
|||
文章錄入:admin 責(zé)任編輯:admin | |||
【發(fā)表評(píng)論】【加入收藏】【告訴好友】【打印此文】【關(guān)閉窗口】 |
|
||||||
| 網(wǎng)站地圖 | 版權(quán)申明 | 設(shè)為首頁(yè) | 加入收藏 | 會(huì)員中心 | 取回密碼 | 友情鏈接 | 用戶留言 | 管理登錄 | ||||
|